Monday, August 25, 2008 ♥ 7:19 PM

a teacher is a person who's job and virtue is to teach that respect can never be gotten by force, or in a day. ironically, that's the only way teachers gain their respect.

i cant believe there's male chauvanists out there. as in, somewhat professionally. think its menarebetterwomen.com. his name is dick tho -.- not being judgemental, but.

anyways, aside from these weird stuff, till today there're many things that somehow i still do not understand the very basis of it. either that, or i understand how or why it came from and exists, but i dont know which nonsensical joker would agree to it.

one would be women rights groups or whatever shitnames they call themselves. why the hell does this even exist?

do women need so much protection? probably yes, in india or some rural places where women are killed or totured mindlessly because of idiot who rather believe in nonexistant things than the flesh and blood in front of them. but most women rights group or whatever, exist not in these places where they are needed the most. these grps actually want money, dont they. but i guess, money makes the world go around, so it covers their evilplotting backside for that point. but why do such people exist? yes, indeed, there are men who illtreat women. point taken and agreed with much consent. how about, women who illtreat men? holy shit, yes as well. so, why dont i hear of men's rights grp or something? do women really deserve better treatment or protection? i mean, if its criminal or civil misdoings, of which BOTH sexes have an EQUAL chance of committing, the law is there for a reason. in that case, do the female rights groups imply that the law isnt protecting them enough? are they trying to say that the law actually protects the men more? in that case, they're saying that the law isn't fair? hold on. the law IS NEVER fair. but what the law does is not to be fair and equal, but to protect and uphold whatever that's done wrong. in that case, do the female rights groups mean that the law isnt protecting them enough? we're back to the start- do they really need more protection? also, if the law doesnt protect them enough, then the law should be revised. the fault is with the law, so dont bring equality and sexist bullshit up. cos in that case, since laws on females and males are the same, then it bloody well isnt protecting BOTH sexes enough! so, square one, why the hell the existence for female rights groups?

what right do they have to ask for rights?


yay. all that jazz that took my mind off conb for a moment. please, all those who took offence on this mere ranting. i love girls, so, dont worry. i'm not chauvanist or gay or sexist or whatever. haha. i just dont like the idea of people creating something special, blowing things up, making a big hoohaa and nitpicking at little little details in order to make stand on their nonsensical idealogies just for the sake of pleasuring their weird desires.

anyways, i totally cant focus, grrh. lets try again. oh well, a few more days, a few more days.